Research grounded in
the judgment, not
the imagination.
The AI workspace for Indian lawyers. Ask any question about Indian case law and get cited, verifiable answers from Supreme Court and High Court judgments — then chat with your own case files, and translate or OCR scanned documents into court-ready Word and PDF.
Free plan includes 5 free chats. No credit card required.
What is the position on anticipatory bail in economic offences?
The Supreme Court has consistently held that anticipatory bail in economic offences requires careful balancing of personal liberty and the gravity of the offence[1]. In P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement, the Court emphasised that economic offences constitute a class apart[2], warranting a stricter approach
Used by 200+ advocates across 12 High Court jurisdictions.
From question — or document — to cited answer.
Ask a question or bring a document
Describe a legal question in plain English — maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, res judicata in writ proceedings — or upload your own files: contracts and pleadings into a workspace, or a scan, photo, or PDF to translate or OCR. No boolean operators, no keyword syntax.
Legal Brain grounds itself in the source
For research, it searches a curated database of real Supreme Court and High Court judgments. For your documents, it reads only what you uploaded — using vision AI to handle scans, faded ink, and handwriting. It works from the actual source, not from memory.
Get cited answers or court-ready files
Answers stream in real time with inline citations you can click to open the exact passage. Download cited judgment PDFs, or export translated and OCR'd documents as formatted Word and PDF files — with anything the model is unsure about flagged for your review.
One workspace for research, your documents, translation, and OCR.
Case-law research, grounded in judgments
Ask a legal question in plain English and get a synthesised answer drawn from real Supreme Court and High Court judgments. Inline citations — [^1], [^2], [^3] — link to the exact passage in the source judgment. No invented case names; trace every statement back to the original text.
Document Workspaces — chat with your own files
Upload your contracts, pleadings, and case files into a private workspace and ask questions answered only from those documents. Every answer cites the source document and page, and shows the exact snippet. If the answer isn't in your files, the assistant says so instead of guessing.
Translate legal documents, structure intact
Translate a PDF, DOCX, scan, or photo into any language with a single vision-native pass that preserves headings, numbered clauses, tables, party labels, and signatures. Download a formatted, court-ready Word file — faded ink and handwriting are read, and anything uncertain is flagged for human review.
OCR scanned & handwritten documents
Turn scans, photos, and handwritten notes into clean, structured text in the original language — no translation. Stamps, seals, and faded type are read by vision AI, layout is preserved, and the result downloads as a tidy PDF or editable Word file with uncertain passages flagged.
Pre-filters that match how you think
Filter case-law research by court, bench strength, judge name, acts and sections cited, case category, petitioner, respondent, case number, or year range — and download every cited judgment as a PDF, in the format courts accept.
Streaming answers and saved history
Responses stream paragraph by paragraph so you can start reading immediately. Every research session, workspace, and document job is saved to your account — return to earlier work and build on it across days, weeks, or months.
The difference between a citation and a fabrication is everything.
General-purpose AI tools generate plausible-sounding legal text. They invent case names, fabricate holdings, and cite judgments that do not exist. For a practising advocate, a single false citation is not just unhelpful — it is professionally dangerous.
Legal Brain is architecturally different. Every answer is generated through retrieval-augmented generation: the system first searches a curated database of real Supreme Court and High Court judgments, retrieves the relevant passages, and only then generates a response grounded in those actual sources. If the database does not contain a relevant judgment, the system says so.
Retrieval-first architecture
Answers are generated only from retrieved judgment text. The AI does not draw on general training data for legal conclusions. Every cited case is a real case in our database.
No training on your queries
Your legal research and uploaded documents are confidential. Legal Brain does not use your queries, your files, or the AI's responses to train or fine-tune any model. Your work product remains yours.
Transparent when uncertain
When the database does not contain sufficient authority — or your documents don't hold the answer — Legal Brain says so clearly rather than generating a speculative response. Anything the model can't read with confidence is flagged, not guessed.
Not another chatbot. Not another keyword search.
| Generic AI | Manual research | Legal Brain | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Answers legal questions | Sometimes accurately | Returns documents, not answers | Cited, grounded answers |
| Cites real judgments | Frequently fabricates | Every citation links to source PDF | |
| Understands Indian law | Partial, unreliable | Comprehensive databases | Built exclusively for Indian case law |
| Saves research time | Fast but unverifiable | Hours of manual reading | Minutes, with verifiable sources |
| Pre-filters by court, judge, act | Varies by platform | 10+ filter dimensions | |
| Free to start | 5 free chats |
Transparent pricing for
serious research.
Start free with five chats total — across research, workspaces, translation, and OCR. Upgrade to Pro when your practice needs unlimited, citation-backed work.
Starter
For advocates exploring AI-powered research.
- 5 free chats total (lifetime, not per month)
- Across research, workspaces, translation & OCR
- Streaming, cited answers
- Supreme Court and High Court coverage
- Inline citations linked to source judgments
- PDF downloads of cited judgments
- Basic search filters (court, year range)
Pro
For advocates who research every day.
- Unlimited chats — research, workspaces, translation & OCR
- Streaming, cited answers grounded in judgments
- Document Workspaces: chat with your own files, cited to page
- Translate documents into any language → court-ready Word
- OCR scanned & handwritten documents → clean PDF / Word
- All pre-filters: court, bench, judge, act, section, category, parties, year
- PDF downloads of cited judgments
- Full history across every tool (unlimited retention)
- Priority processing and email support
Pricing questions
Can I try Pro before committing?
The free plan gives you a genuine sense of how Legal Brain works. Five free chats total — shared across case-law research, document workspaces, translation, and OCR — with the same quality as the Pro plan. The primary difference is volume: Pro removes the limit and unlocks every tool and pre-filter.
What payment methods do you accept?
We accept all major Indian credit cards, debit cards, UPI, and net banking through Razorpay. All transactions are processed securely in Indian Rupees.
Can I switch between monthly and annual billing?
Yes. You can switch from monthly to annual billing at any time from your account settings. When switching to annual, you will be billed ₹15,000 for the year and save ₹3,000 compared to monthly billing.
What happens if I cancel?
You retain full access through the end of your current billing period. After that, your account reverts to the free plan. Your research history is preserved and remains accessible.
Do you offer team or firm pricing?
Not yet. Legal Brain is currently designed for individual advocates. If you are interested in firm-wide access, contact us at hello@nyayasearch.com and we will work with you.
Is GST included in the price?
GST of 18% is charged in addition to the listed price, in compliance with Indian tax regulations. The invoice will reflect the base price plus applicable GST.
Questions advocates ask before they start.
Legal Brain uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which means every answer is grounded in actual judgment text retrieved from our database. The AI does not generate case names, citations, or holdings from its general training data. Every inline citation links to the real source judgment. If the database does not contain a relevant judgment for your query, the system will indicate that the available authority is limited rather than fabricate an answer.